Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The Lost Boys


Last week we took our niece & nephew to see a professional touring production of PETER PAN, starring Kathy Rigby in the title role. At the age of 58, she's still flying and leaping and tumbling--a real inspiration, and her effect on my nephew, who has Down Syndrome, was nothing short of magical. As we left, he informed us that Peter Pan was "going to come to my house and teach me how to fly."

As I watched the show, I recalled the various articles that came out about 20 years ago about the "Wendy Syndrome." Someone in the pop-psychology camp had capitalized on this story as an allegorical device for describing a particular type of woman--one who was nurturing and loving and motherly, but at the expense of having genuinely mature relationships with men. "Wendys" are always trying to save their "Peter Pans," men who never really grow up, but who are incessantly fun and fascinating. They love their Wendys, but are incapable of reciprocating with an adult-level love.

I started thinking about all the "lost boys" in my life, and there are PLENTY of them, although I use that term to describe men who aren't necessarily immature, but those who simply have not seemed to be able to find or develop a lasting romantic relationship. And I am honestly mystified as to why love has eluded them. They are all worthy of it--intelligent, funny, talented to the extreme, and, for the most part, exceedingly responsible and upstanding citizens. Some gay--some straight, but all people that I genuinely admire and adore. So if I can see it, why can't others?

Is it the Wendy in me? Do I idealize them on a certain level as a doting mother or big sister would? I know a part of me aches to give them the love that they're missing--I definitely have that in common with Wendy. But I don't think I romanticize them--I think I really do see them as they are. So why can't someone else? They are all relatively good-looking, they go to work every day, they are kind to their mothers and generous to their friends. So where is their special someone who will love and put them first?

Considering the fact that fat little me found someone, I just don't get it. I mean, I'm loud, bossy, and selfish, but I managed to find someone who loves me beyond belief. Maybe it's all sheer luck. I just wish mine would rub off on them. Hey, Beth--can I borrow a little bit of your pixie dust?

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Ill With Want


Current song obsession: The Avett Brothers' Ill With Want. "I am sick with wanting, and it's evil and it's daunting how I let everything I cherish lay to waste...Something has me...oh, something has me...acting like someone I know isn't me...Ill with want and poisoned by this ugly greed..."

Welcome to middle age, boys.

By the time you figure out what you've missed, you're stuck with who you are and the choices that led you there, and are faced with the dawning realization that your remaining options, like your years, are far more limited than you thought they'd ever be. Arriving at this place where, to quote The Bard, you are "with what I must enjoy, contented least," you finally understand that there's little to no one to blame but yourself, and that the primary reason for all this is not necessarily what you did, but what you DIDN'T care enough to do.

Which leads to another line from another song that has hit me hard this week. It's from a Mumford & Sons song called I Gave You All: "If only I had an enemy bigger than my apathy, I could have won." Apathy is the name of EVERYTHING I've done wrong in or with my life. If only SOMETHING (or something IN me) had moved me, motiviated me, or challenged me to overcome this laziness and complacency--not even love ever seemed enough to do it.

Throughout my life, I have always been, alternatively, both proud and just a little dismayed by the fact that I'm so "even keeled." Until very recently, I never spent a lot of time being emotionally high or low...I tend to just take things as they come. I never got overly sad or angry or tortured about anything, but by the same token, things that elated or brought squeals of transcendant joy from others have always elicited from me a "tamped down" reaction. I'm happy, of course, but my joy levels seem to be wrapped up in the same modulator as my sadness.

And what modulates those feelings? Is it my apathy itself that's causing the interference? Or is it my lack of emotionalism that causes the apathy? Which came first--chicken or egg? Does it even matter?

The saying goes, "It's never too late." But when you're talking about things that are reserved for the truly young and beautiful to experience, that's just not true. "Age is a state of mind," they say. Maybe so, but it's also perfectly and permanently etched on your face. I can THINK I'm 29 and thin and gorgeous all I want to, but it doesn't make it true, and can NEVER make it true. Sometimes you just have to know when to stop hoping and dreaming, and accept the fact that you, via your own apathy, are the only one to blame.

Which leaves us where? Well, there's two choices, I guess: continue to grumble and be "ill with want" and let the things you cherish lay to waste, or snap out of it and start being grateful for the abundance of goodness in your life. Which abundance, in fact, I do have. It's kind of disgraceful that I would even be so selfish and unappreciative. But middle age is definitely a stop & assess time, and one can't help but have their regrets, regardless of the charmed life they've been given. I've thought for years that I was a "grown-up," someone who's responsible and mature and productive. But maybe this is the moment when one truly becomes a grown-up--that moment when you REALLY put childish dreams away, accept that you're a mortal being, and focus your attention on whatever good you have or comes your way in your remaining time.

Sometimes I think religion, or at least the nearly universal idea of an afterlife, plays a large part in our apathy or complacency. It definitely serves a very necessary purpose--if everyone believed this was it, much to Gene Roddenberry's chagrin, we'd probably all be looting & shooting up and doing who knows how many unspeakable things to each other--the general idea of an afterlife that promises not only eternal bliss for the good, but eternal damnation for the wicked is not such a bad thing when you look at the history of evils commited by humans against each other. But the idea that this is NOT all there is also gives you an excuse...you can abdicate responsibility for your own happiness by assuming that whatever you do or whatever gets dished out to you here will be made up for in the afterlife--if you just try to be a good person and/or believe in some form of salvation, you'll go to heaven, and all this will be merely a prelude to an eternal existence of perfection.

Huh.

But if THIS is all there is, how much joy have we robbed ourselves of by believing we'd all get a do-over?

Something to think about...tomorrow.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Inside Out

“It’s what’s on the inside that counts.” Bull. Shit.

I’m not saying that the inside doesn’t count, but I’m here to tell you that the outside counts, too. And just as much, if not more so.

A confession: one of my favorite stories about myself is one I heard just before I was married. Some of my mother’s closest friends held a dinner party for me and my bridesmaids–I think there might have been eight of us there total. Anyway, our long-time neighbor related a story about having run into my ballet teacher at an event years prior, around the time I graduated high school, and reported that she said to her, of me, “I remember the day her mother first brought her to my dance school-I remember thinking to myself that she was absolutely the single most beautiful child I had ever seen–all eyes and that long black hair--she took my breath away.”

I guess it’s pretty shallow of me to hold onto that–I mean, we’re not talking about anything except outward appearances, and she probably said equally flattering things about many of her students over the years. Plus, it’s no great achievement to be cute when you’re only seven years old. But it DOES mean a lot to me, because as one of those girls who grew up to become the victim of overzealous puberty, genetics, and my own apathy that conspired to keep me short & fat for the remainder of my life (I learned the truth at seventeen/that love was meant for beauty queens....Janis Ian? Anyone??), it’s the one and only moment I know of in my entire life, with any certainty, that someone looked at me and saw pure BEAUTY. That I took someone’s breath away...that I inspired some kind of aesthetic awe.

There are beautiful people who go through life doing nothing but that, and I imagine that their complaint is that people ONLY see the outside, and don’t fully appreciate what’s going on inside. And in a way, I guess that can be just as painful a burden. But since I have no point of reference for that particular disadvantage...

The truth is that it ALL matters–the inside AND the outside. For what am I but what I am, in my entirety? My thoughts might ramble around in my mind, and those I commit to paper or voice might continue to tumble out into the ether, and might, in and of themselves, be meaningful or inspirational or even beautiful to others. But once those words leave the confines of my own body, they aren’t ME. They are shadows left behind. They can’t enjoy the feelings they engender–they never see the nods of agreement or hear the sighs of kindred spirits, nor do I. You might get a comment or two on a blog, and that’s something, for sure. But, again, that’s a disembodied kind of connection. I am CONNECTED to MYSELF. Everything I experience, my thoughts, my joys, my pains–they are all manifestations of this living, physical organism. If there is an afterlife, and I suddenly find myself on some astral plain as nothing but a collection of thoughts and feelings, then I’ll believe that the inside counts for more. But until then, I am trapped and at the mercy of what I, as a physical being, am able to experience, and those experiences are dictated and limited by what I look like.

I don’t feel the need to be gorgeous or perfect–I’d just really like to be “average.” You might think it’s a pretty sad state of affairs when your biggest dream is to be physically “average,” but “average” people, in my opinion, have the advantage of being able to participate in the widest range of experiences--social, physical, intellectual, spiritual, etc. When you’re super-beautiful, people can often objectify you and make assumptions about your intelligence, or, even if your intelligence is readily appreciated, it’s generally always secondary to your beauty. They also tend to assume that if you’re beautiful on the outside, that you’re also beautiful on the inside. However, when you’re NOT attractive on the outside, you don’t necessarily get any thoughts directed your way beyond that. People don’t look at an ugly person and assume they’re intelligent and/or beautiful on the inside–quite the opposite, usually. So there really IS more of a disadvantage to NOT being beautiful.

Which brings me back to the average Joe. Average Joe has far more freedom to create himself and his experiences. He’s a blank page on which we are free to project our basic assumptions of human potential and goodness. He’s the proverbial pot of porridge that’s “just right.” He and the average Jane are simply accepted as they are--they don't intimidate or repulse others. They’re not unduly pitied or reviled for being ugly, nor undeservedly envied or revered for being beautiful. People look at their average faces and bodies and assume “here’s a couple of fine, upstanding people, much like myself–they’re probably good folks.”

I prefer average looking people, myself. That’s who I actually tend to really note “beauty” in, both physically and spiritually. You might be 15 pounds overweight with thinning hair, but your eyes make my heart melt. You might have crooked teeth and bad skin, but your hands are lovely and expressive. I look at you and say to myself, “see, they’re not perfect, either, but they have perfectly beautiful physical things about them that draw me to them,” and that’s enough. I NOTICE these little things--all the time.

I have been fortunate in my life that most of the people I’ve encountered on a personal level also happen to be fairly intelligent, insightful, and talented. So the assumptions I make about my “average” compatriots’ intelligence or spiritual beauty tend to be a positive foregone conclusion. Of course the deeper you dive into another person’s psyche the more beautiful they become–their words and thoughts DO inform your vision of them in the physical realm. But your connection to them is still completely interdependent–it’s the physical/spiritual/intellectual combo plate–it can’t be ordered a la carte.

Do other people ever really look past my overall physicality and start to see any of those little pieces of perfection? Or do they just enjoy my company and admire my talents enough to the point that they don’t even really “see” me at all? Fortunately (or unfortunately–I can’t quite decide which), I think the answer is “yes” to the latter. Case in point: a few weeks ago, I organized and emceed a cabaret evening as a fund raiser for a local charity, which featured musical performances of show tunes by several women theatre leaders in our community, myself included. I was so overheated from running around getting everything together, that by the time the show was underway and I was up there under the lights introducing and later on performing, my face was wringing wet. I used a napkin to blot away the sweat (trying to preserve what little good my makeup was doing me), and by the time I got ready for bed that night, after having come home and sat at my own kitchen table with my husband and four of my closest friends for another couple of hours, I looked in the bedroom mirror as I took off my jewelry and realized that I had two small pieces of napkin still stuck to my face–right there on my cheek and on my forehead. And NO ONE saw them. Or if they did, they didn’t bother to tell me I had schmutz on my face. And the last time I had “dabbed” my face that evening was in the middle of the program. Which means not only did those sitting right across from me at my own kitchen table not register the crap on my face, but neither did anyone I was performing with, which is bizarre...So is it that (A) no one cares enough to tell me or (B) no one really SEES me?

I know people love me. I know that in spite of my imperfections that they do, in fact, see the beauty in what lies within. But I think they’ve learned to divorce my inside from my outside, and I find that really sad, in a way. Mainly because that’s what I’ve been doing for YEARS. I had a friend tell me one time (and she intended it as a compliment) that she was really amazed by me–that she thought it was great that I didn’t let my weight limit me socially–that I seemed to always be willing to go out and do the things I wanted to do. Which, when turned around in my stinking-thinking mind sounded like, “Gee, it’s great that you don’t let the fact that you’re fat get in the way of your having a good time.” Which was actually kind of true, because I have kind of always pretended that I’m not. I always thought I “carried it well.” I think I might have what they refer to in anorexics as body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). In the anorexic’s case, it usually manifests itself as their inability to look in the mirror and see their skeletal visage as anything but fat. I think BDD works the other way around in my case–I see myself as being about half the size I actually am. It also affects the way I see just my face–I look in a mirror, and I think, "at least I have a beautiful face," but then I look at photographs and they tell a completely different story! Mirrors do, in fact, lie. They lie like rugs.

So, what’s the point of this particular afternoon’s musings on inner vs. outer beauty? How did I even get here today? And is this line of thinking going to take me anywhere new? Will it lead me to a new understanding and acceptance of myself, or will it spur me on to more strongly endeavor to change myself? Or will my oldest and dearest, apathy, keep me right where I am? Who knows....who knows.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Beneath the Paint and Armor


Today's musical inspiration comes as a result of listening to my Ben Folds collection, top to bottom. It's been a long time since I spent time with this music, which has meant so much to me over the years. And it's funny how each song carries with it a specific thought pattern--rarely do we let the storyteller simply tell his stories without superimposing our own experiences upon them--you tend to either turn the lyrics outward onto those you know, or inward upon yourself, and you make the stories your own.

But once in awhile, your own stories or perspective can change. A song that has always held one meaning suddenly holds another. That was true today with "Jane." I've always applied this one outward on an old friend of mine who at one time seemed to be struggling with being at peace with who he is. But today, it was for me.

Jane, be Jane--
You’re better that way
Not when you’re trying
Imitating something you think you saw

So Jane, be Jane--
And though sometimes that might
Drive them away
Let them stay there–you don’t need them anyway

You’re worried there might not be anything at all inside
But that you’re worried should tell you that’s not right
Don’t try to see yourself the way that others do - it’s no use
You’ve had it harder than anyone could know - so hard to let it go.


But it’s your life
And you can decorate it as you like
Beneath the paint and armor,
In your eyes, the truth still shines


Jane, be Jane.

Here’s hoping that even though I don’t often feel like it’s even there, that, indeed, “beneath the paint and armor...the truth still shines.”

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Photographic Evidence

Camera never was my friend, at least not since 4th grade
Recently got rid of a lot of extra baggage,
So I tried making friends again with the lens
Big mistake...he’s pissed, apparently...because I SWEAR TO GOD that the photographic evidence has been doctored

It’s not just the lines and wrinkles...
It’s the hideous mask hanging over who I thought I was
I even adjusted the lighting...you know, all those great tricks to get the camera to see what you want it so see
But not this guy...he’s treating me to the full frontal reality:
I am old.

Friday, September 10, 2010

At Arm's Length

Afraid of my own foolishness
Never wanting to be a fool
No–wanting to be a fool,
But never wanting to be judged a fool

Quiet in the corner
Lest my open mouth expose my ignorance
Let them assume still waters run deep
When in fact they are dangerously, dangerously shallow–
"No Diving Allowed" should be legally required

Always an imitation of myself
Tough girl, together girl,
Good girl...with the curl in the middle of her forehead
Who can be so horrid, horrid, horrid

Every one is at arm’s length
Every feeling, stretched even farther away
Let sleeping dogs lie, and let my lies remain dormant
Say nothing...say nothing...admit to nothing

Middle-age crazy, worse than teenage angst
At least then, despair was irrelevant in the face of the extra time on the clock
No time like the present...it’s all that’s left
A gift horse with her mouth sewn shut

Muddied mind, mixed metaphors, meaningless except to me
What’s the point? I mean seriously, what’s the point?
Stay out of here...the mind’s a steel trap
Baited with honey and unfulfilled wishes.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Once

John and I watched the new indie film ONCE a few months back. The music was sublime and haunting, and rightfully received an Oscar for Best Song for "Falling Slowly," which, in my opinion, wasn't even the best song in the film.

Singers and songwriters Glen Hansard (of The Frames) and Marketa Irglova spend the film playing fictionalized versions of themselves in what can best be described as something akin to a documentary about recording an album with a simple and bittersweet love story superimposed upon it.

Spoiler Alert: I'm about to reveal some plot points and the ending....read no further if you don't want to know!

An Irish street performer has a chance encounter with a young Czech immigrant, and they quickly discover they both love music. She (we never learn their names) takes him to a piano store where the owner lets her play during her lunch hours (since she can't afford a piano of her own), and he teaches her a song he's working on. They immediately connect and produce a lovely piece of music. After just a couple of days or so, now newly inspired, he decides to go ahead and record the demo record he's been putting off for years, getting her to write lyrics to one of his tunes, and hiring other musicians and obtaining studio time (for which she helps negotiate a 30% discount). In the interim, we find out he's been desperately pining after his old girlfriend, and she's been separated from her husband. There are some really nice romantic moments and some amazing musical moments, but they never connect physically. You can tell they're falling in love, but it's not necessarily with each other. The film ends with him heading off to London to shop his demo around to music labels and to rejoin his old love, with the girl welcoming her husband back into her home and life with their little girl. To repay her for her inspiration, the singer arranges to have a piano delivered to her home. Their entire story takes place in less than a week's time.

Although you're pulling all the while for them to end up together, there are clues along the way that it won't work out that way. She remarks several times that he must still be in love with whomever he's writing these passionate songs about, and when asked if she's still in love with her husband, she answers in Czech, and never translates.

What I adore about this love story is that it illustrates how there are so many different kinds of love stories that we all play out throughout our lives. What I mean is, every new person who comes into our lives in any meaningful way creates a new "love story." I've most often experienced it in terms of creative collaboration. Working on a play, you get to know new people and/or deepen existing relationships, which I find to be quite thrilling, and emotionally similar to that feeling of falling in love. I also fall in love with the art created. Unfortunately, I think that's why "backstage romances" are such a common (and dangerous) thing--it's not necessarily that we're really falling in love with some one, but rather we're responding to the excitement of new experiences and deepened understanding. It's very easy to get caught up in those feelings and mistake them for something they're not. It's also easy to see how people become junkies, in a fashion, for those feelings, pushing and forcing them into dangerous territories in order to keep the rush going. The trick, I guess, is to figure out how to balance revelry in the rush with a sense of perspective, and realize that's the best way to truly honor the experience for the vital nourishment to the soul that it imparts.


The two characters in ONCE ultimately understand this. They come to realize that it's possible to find and embrace a soul-mate that's not necessarily meant to be your romantic partner. They immerse themselves in their amazing collaboration and, in a very short but intense amount of time, make the absolute most of what it is destined to be. Their spirits co-mingle and they fall in love with the act of creation and its sublime consummation.

Not a bad way to spend a week.