Saturday, July 16, 2011

Inside Out

“It’s what’s on the inside that counts.” Bull. Shit.

I’m not saying that the inside doesn’t count, but I’m here to tell you that the outside counts, too. And just as much, if not more so.

A confession: one of my favorite stories about myself is one I heard just before I was married. Some of my mother’s closest friends held a dinner party for me and my bridesmaids–I think there might have been eight of us there total. Anyway, our long-time neighbor related a story about having run into my ballet teacher at an event years prior, around the time I graduated high school, and reported that she said to her, of me, “I remember the day her mother first brought her to my dance school-I remember thinking to myself that she was absolutely the single most beautiful child I had ever seen–all eyes and that long black hair--she took my breath away.”

I guess it’s pretty shallow of me to hold onto that–I mean, we’re not talking about anything except outward appearances, and she probably said equally flattering things about many of her students over the years. Plus, it’s no great achievement to be cute when you’re only seven years old. But it DOES mean a lot to me, because as one of those girls who grew up to become the victim of overzealous puberty, genetics, and my own apathy that conspired to keep me short & fat for the remainder of my life (I learned the truth at seventeen/that love was meant for beauty queens....Janis Ian? Anyone??), it’s the one and only moment I know of in my entire life, with any certainty, that someone looked at me and saw pure BEAUTY. That I took someone’s breath away...that I inspired some kind of aesthetic awe.

There are beautiful people who go through life doing nothing but that, and I imagine that their complaint is that people ONLY see the outside, and don’t fully appreciate what’s going on inside. And in a way, I guess that can be just as painful a burden. But since I have no point of reference for that particular disadvantage...

The truth is that it ALL matters–the inside AND the outside. For what am I but what I am, in my entirety? My thoughts might ramble around in my mind, and those I commit to paper or voice might continue to tumble out into the ether, and might, in and of themselves, be meaningful or inspirational or even beautiful to others. But once those words leave the confines of my own body, they aren’t ME. They are shadows left behind. They can’t enjoy the feelings they engender–they never see the nods of agreement or hear the sighs of kindred spirits, nor do I. You might get a comment or two on a blog, and that’s something, for sure. But, again, that’s a disembodied kind of connection. I am CONNECTED to MYSELF. Everything I experience, my thoughts, my joys, my pains–they are all manifestations of this living, physical organism. If there is an afterlife, and I suddenly find myself on some astral plain as nothing but a collection of thoughts and feelings, then I’ll believe that the inside counts for more. But until then, I am trapped and at the mercy of what I, as a physical being, am able to experience, and those experiences are dictated and limited by what I look like.

I don’t feel the need to be gorgeous or perfect–I’d just really like to be “average.” You might think it’s a pretty sad state of affairs when your biggest dream is to be physically “average,” but “average” people, in my opinion, have the advantage of being able to participate in the widest range of experiences--social, physical, intellectual, spiritual, etc. When you’re super-beautiful, people can often objectify you and make assumptions about your intelligence, or, even if your intelligence is readily appreciated, it’s generally always secondary to your beauty. They also tend to assume that if you’re beautiful on the outside, that you’re also beautiful on the inside. However, when you’re NOT attractive on the outside, you don’t necessarily get any thoughts directed your way beyond that. People don’t look at an ugly person and assume they’re intelligent and/or beautiful on the inside–quite the opposite, usually. So there really IS more of a disadvantage to NOT being beautiful.

Which brings me back to the average Joe. Average Joe has far more freedom to create himself and his experiences. He’s a blank page on which we are free to project our basic assumptions of human potential and goodness. He’s the proverbial pot of porridge that’s “just right.” He and the average Jane are simply accepted as they are--they don't intimidate or repulse others. They’re not unduly pitied or reviled for being ugly, nor undeservedly envied or revered for being beautiful. People look at their average faces and bodies and assume “here’s a couple of fine, upstanding people, much like myself–they’re probably good folks.”

I prefer average looking people, myself. That’s who I actually tend to really note “beauty” in, both physically and spiritually. You might be 15 pounds overweight with thinning hair, but your eyes make my heart melt. You might have crooked teeth and bad skin, but your hands are lovely and expressive. I look at you and say to myself, “see, they’re not perfect, either, but they have perfectly beautiful physical things about them that draw me to them,” and that’s enough. I NOTICE these little things--all the time.

I have been fortunate in my life that most of the people I’ve encountered on a personal level also happen to be fairly intelligent, insightful, and talented. So the assumptions I make about my “average” compatriots’ intelligence or spiritual beauty tend to be a positive foregone conclusion. Of course the deeper you dive into another person’s psyche the more beautiful they become–their words and thoughts DO inform your vision of them in the physical realm. But your connection to them is still completely interdependent–it’s the physical/spiritual/intellectual combo plate–it can’t be ordered a la carte.

Do other people ever really look past my overall physicality and start to see any of those little pieces of perfection? Or do they just enjoy my company and admire my talents enough to the point that they don’t even really “see” me at all? Fortunately (or unfortunately–I can’t quite decide which), I think the answer is “yes” to the latter. Case in point: a few weeks ago, I organized and emceed a cabaret evening as a fund raiser for a local charity, which featured musical performances of show tunes by several women theatre leaders in our community, myself included. I was so overheated from running around getting everything together, that by the time the show was underway and I was up there under the lights introducing and later on performing, my face was wringing wet. I used a napkin to blot away the sweat (trying to preserve what little good my makeup was doing me), and by the time I got ready for bed that night, after having come home and sat at my own kitchen table with my husband and four of my closest friends for another couple of hours, I looked in the bedroom mirror as I took off my jewelry and realized that I had two small pieces of napkin still stuck to my face–right there on my cheek and on my forehead. And NO ONE saw them. Or if they did, they didn’t bother to tell me I had schmutz on my face. And the last time I had “dabbed” my face that evening was in the middle of the program. Which means not only did those sitting right across from me at my own kitchen table not register the crap on my face, but neither did anyone I was performing with, which is bizarre...So is it that (A) no one cares enough to tell me or (B) no one really SEES me?

I know people love me. I know that in spite of my imperfections that they do, in fact, see the beauty in what lies within. But I think they’ve learned to divorce my inside from my outside, and I find that really sad, in a way. Mainly because that’s what I’ve been doing for YEARS. I had a friend tell me one time (and she intended it as a compliment) that she was really amazed by me–that she thought it was great that I didn’t let my weight limit me socially–that I seemed to always be willing to go out and do the things I wanted to do. Which, when turned around in my stinking-thinking mind sounded like, “Gee, it’s great that you don’t let the fact that you’re fat get in the way of your having a good time.” Which was actually kind of true, because I have kind of always pretended that I’m not. I always thought I “carried it well.” I think I might have what they refer to in anorexics as body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). In the anorexic’s case, it usually manifests itself as their inability to look in the mirror and see their skeletal visage as anything but fat. I think BDD works the other way around in my case–I see myself as being about half the size I actually am. It also affects the way I see just my face–I look in a mirror, and I think, "at least I have a beautiful face," but then I look at photographs and they tell a completely different story! Mirrors do, in fact, lie. They lie like rugs.

So, what’s the point of this particular afternoon’s musings on inner vs. outer beauty? How did I even get here today? And is this line of thinking going to take me anywhere new? Will it lead me to a new understanding and acceptance of myself, or will it spur me on to more strongly endeavor to change myself? Or will my oldest and dearest, apathy, keep me right where I am? Who knows....who knows.

2 comments:

Beth said...

So much to think about in this post... my gut reaction was to want to argue that, of course, it IS what's inside that counts. And I believe it is - ultimately; but not necessarily initially, or in passing. Going by the exterior is what's quick and easy, and as a society, that's usually how we roll. Which sucks.

However, when you get into the people who DO know you, that's even trickier. Do we SEE each other, or STOP seeing each other. What a question! Been thinking about that for the last 20 minutes now. And I think the answer for me, at least, is sort of a combination. When I know someone really, really, well, I don't *constantly* "see" them. i just know them, and the love is big and obvious and the details go unnoticed. But I do, in moments that are not infrequent, 'see' them - catch a laugh-line, an eye-twinkle, a familiar graceful gesture that I notice again anew and think, wow. Gorgeous.

Sorry about the napkin. I really didn't notice it. Must have been in default not-seeing mode (combined with exhausted and knee-shaking from my own anxiety). But if it's any consolation, I notice your smart, taking-it-all-in eyes and your expressive, always-delightfully-ringed fingers time and time again. Gorgeous.

dramamama said...

I know what you mean about seeing oneself as smaller than one really is. I have bruises on my hips and shins to prove that I truly believe I am smaller than I am these days.

As one of the gifts from my theater troupe as I closed my last show, I was given a photo taken of me, sitting in my camp chair, directing. I am so glad it was dark at the presentation on stage and difficult to see- difficult for me to see the picture, difficult for them to see my reaction, because I was horrified. Really? Do I look like that? Is that a FLATTERING picture?

I struggle with this all the time - http://pepys21.blogspot.com/2009/01/young-thin-beautiful.html one of my attempts to think about it.

A few comments that your very thought provoking post suggested to me:

1. This is a wound worn more by women. Men can be older, quirky, overweight, and still be attractive/desirable. Not fair. But true.

2. Do people eventually *see* us, or *not see* us, once they get to know us? Beth says a combination. I don't know. I *see* change in a familiar face or figure, in the physical world; and I genuinely think that once I know someone, the person/physic/ality becomes some sort of unified gestalt. I see my daughter C, for example, and I see parts of my history with her, this day's events, and the particular sparkle of her eyes today. I *recognize* her, rather than see and inventory her face...

Here are two stories to illustrate what I am trying to express:

Using the example of daughter C: She was featured on a poster for one of the plays she was in. Looking at the poster shocked me; in some ways she was hideous, at least that photo. I had to check out the features and put them back together to recognize her.

(If you are interested, you can see what I think she looks like - sort of- you can see it on my facebook photos at http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=229431031160&set=t.621368861&type=1

then the poster can be found at http://www.brikenbrak.org/Samaritan%20Syndrome.html - I hope).

The other story is about my dad's wife's son (since we met as adults, I don't feel "step-anything"). My not-stepbrother R was horribly burned when he was 7 years old and almost died. His face is a disfigured mask of scars; in places his scalp is scarred so that hair does not grow there.

When I first met him, I was uncomfortable. I didn't know where to look. All I could see was the scarring and disfigurement.

As time went on, I got to know him- and I got over the shock of first seeing him. Now, I don't notice the scars. It's not that I don't SEE them; it's just that it is one part of the picture, of the gestalt, that is R.

So, in this long and roundabout way, I guess I'm trying to get at the idea that, given time, people who get to know us, get to see it all. It's not that the warts, the weight or the scars become invisible; it's just *part* of the gestalt.